Thanks Domenic,

> Can you be sure to update these as part of shipping the new behavior?

Absolutely, sorry if that wasn't clear that we will be doing this. :)

> Why no Finch flag?

Because Chromestatus didn't ask me for one before reaching the I2P stage,
and I missed this field when manually editing the email 😅. Naively, there
will be a default Finch flag here from the base::Feature generated from
the RuntimeEnabledFeature, and that Finch flag will act as a killswitch as
needed. Is something more expected? (Do web platform launches use Finch
rollouts nowadays? Been a while since I've been in the WP space!)

> Please be sure to fill this out before shipping so that this change gets
properly messaged on ChromeStatus's roadmap, the beta blogpost, etc.

Absolutely will do; this will be filled out before sending the I2S.

On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 at 00:26, Domenic Denicola <dome...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Thanks for this attention to detail! A few minor points:
>
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 12:52 AM Stephen McGruer <smcgr...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Note: We've done outreach to the WPWG members (
>> https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-payments-wg/2025Feb/0008.html),
>> and are following up with known partners directly.
>>
>> We don't have UseCounters here currently; I'm hoping to land some for
>> M135, but this is such a niche case (creation within an iframe is
>> rare/non-existent today in practice, and this further requires that you are
>> catching *and care about* the specific error type for missing user
>> activation) that I may request I2S without that data.
>>
>> On Monday, February 24, 2025 at 10:34:46 AM UTC-5 Stephen McGruer wrote:
>>
>>> Contact emailssmcgr...@chromium.org
>>>
>>> Explainerhttps://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation. A few
>>> more /issues/267
>>> <https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/issues/267>
>>>
>>> SpecificationNone
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> Correct the error type thrown during WebAuthn credential creation for
>>> 'payment' credentials. Due to a historic specification mismatch, creating a
>>> 'payment' credential in a cross-origin iframe without a user activation
>>> would throw a SecurityError instead of a NotAllowedError, which is what is
>>> thrown for non-payment credentials. This is a breaking change, albeit a
>>> niche one. Code that previously detected the type of error thrown (e.g., `e
>>> instanceof SecurityError`) would be affected. Code that just generally
>>> handles errors during credential creation (e.g. `catch (e)`) will continue
>>> to function correctly.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink componentBlink>Payments
>>> <https://issues.chromium.org/issues?q=customfield1222907:%22Blink%3EPayments%22>
>>>
>>> Motivation
>>>
>>> As part of Secure Payment Confirmation (SPC), WebAuthn credentials with
>>> the 'payment' extension could be created in a cross-origin iframe before
>>> this was allowed for other WebAuthn credentials. When the ability to do
>>> this for all WebAuthn credentials was added in
>>> https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/pull/1801, an accidental spec
>>> misalignment was made. In the very specific case of credential creation in
>>> a cross-origin iframe without user activation, the SPC spec said to throw a
>>> SecurityError, whilst the WebAuthn spec said to throw a NotAllowedError.
>>> This misalignment has now been corrected at the specification level (
>>> https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/issues/267), and so
>>> left Chromium as non-compliant with the specification.
>>>
>>>
>>> Initial public proposal
>>> https://github.com/w3c/secure-payment-confirmation/issues/267
>>>
>>> TAG reviewNone
>>>
>>> TAG review statusN/A - minor change to existing specification
>>>
>>> Risks
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: N/A - minor change to existing specification. Note that SPC is
>>> not implemented or supported by Gecko.
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: N/A - minor change to existing specification. Note that SPC
>>> is not implemented or supported by Gecko.
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ?Yes (but still testing the old behavior) -
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/secure-payment-confirmation/enrollment-in-iframe.sub.https.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>>>
>>
> Can you be sure to update these as part of shipping the new behavior?
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Flag name on about://flags
>>> chrome://web-authentication-align-error-type-for-payment-credential-create
>>>
>>> Finch feature nameNone
>>>
>>> Non-finch justificationNone
>>>
>>
> Why no Finch flag?
>
>
>>
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>>
>>> No milestones specified
>>>
>>
> Please be sure to fill this out before shipping so that this change gets
> properly messaged on ChromeStatus's roadmap, the beta blogpost, etc.
>
>
>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5160752715137024?gate=6260632086904832
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/39f5811d-a696-4fa0-8caa-720c18880799n%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/39f5811d-a696-4fa0-8caa-720c18880799n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADY3Mae6vAS%3DVOhd7K6w7QrivQsiu0fNSnH%3DSDwxEEmtPenr3g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to