Indeed, thanks for working through this! LGTM1.

On Thursday, February 13, 2025 at 3:28:47 AM UTC+9 Jeffrey Yasskin wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 10:07 AM Noam Rosenthal <nrosent...@chromium.org> 
> wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 10:49:02 AM UTC Noam Rosenthal wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 8:51 PM Noam Rosenthal <nrosent...@chromium.org> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>    - https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10647
>>
>> This one is not actionable and doesn't affect shape(), it's about path().
>>
>>
>> I think "not actionable 
>> <https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/actionable>" isn't a great 
>> way to describe this issue: Lea's suggesting that this functionality be 
>> provided as part of the `path()` function and that `shape()` not be defined 
>> at this time. That's a concrete action that affects `shape()`.
>>
>>
>> My bad, I mixed it with #9889 
>> <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/9889>. it does affect 
>> `shape()` as in proposing to do something else instead, which is described 
>> in general terms (which is what I mean by "not actionable", I should have 
>> been more specific).
>>
>> Update: I'm working through this issue to gain clarity about whether it 
>> contains any objections that should change something about the `shape()` 
>> feature, and will update here when this is resolved.
>>
>>
>> Coming back to this: the CSSWG has resolved that we'll keep `shape()` as 
>> is, and separately in the expand `path()` to have a more restrictive (but 
>> still CSS-y) version derived from `shape()`. See resolution 
>> <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/10647#issuecomment-2654446913>
>> . 
>> I went over the list of [css-shapes-2] issues 
>> <https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues?q=state%3Aopen%20label%3A%22css-shapes-2%22>
>>  
>> again and all the issues either have a resolution that matches what the 
>> implementation already does, or is a future thing that's compatible with 
>> the current `shape()` (both spec and chromium/webkit implementations).
>> So I'm re-instating my intent to ship `shape()` as implemented and the 
>> request for API owner approval :)
>>
>
> Thank you for working through that, even though it resulted in no change 
> to this intent!
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f571ae30-5d66-44b7-999d-12d06a8b0123n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to