LGTM3

On Tuesday, February 11, 2025 at 7:52:25 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote:

> LGTM2
> On 2/11/25 1:46 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote:
>
> LGTM1
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:06 AM Nan Lin <lin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Blink Owners, 
>>
>> Just friendly ping, are there any more questions for this feature please?
>>
>> We hope to get the approvals before Feb 18 so that we can still target 
>> M134 for the feature.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nan
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:42 AM Nan Lin <lin...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Yoav, 
>>>
>>> Thanks for the response.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2025 at 11:14 AM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
>>> yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 8:19:10 PM UTC+1 Akash Nadan wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Mike, 
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for flagging this. We have requested all of the bits in the 
>>>> chromestatus entry.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Akash
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, January 28, 2025 at 7:17:03 AM UTC-8 Mike Taylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Please request the various bits in your chromestatus entry, thanks.
>>>> On 1/24/25 5:05 PM, 'Akash Nadan' via blink-dev wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Contact emails 
>>>>
>>>> akash...@google.com, lin...@chromium.org, john...@chromium.org, 
>>>> arp...@chromium.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Explainer 
>>>>
>>>> Attribution Reporting API with Aggregatable Reports 
>>>> <https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/AGGREGATE.md>
>>>>
>>>> Aggregation Service for the Attribution Reporting API 
>>>> <https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/AGGREGATION_SERVICE_TEE.md>
>>>>
>>>> Specification 
>>>>
>>>> https://wicg.github.io/attribution-reporting-api/
>>>>
>>>> Blink component 
>>>>
>>>> Internals > AttributionReporting 
>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3EAttributionReporting>
>>>>
>>>> TAG review 
>>>>
>>>> Original I2S for the Attribution Reporting API - Closed 
>>>> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/724>
>>>>
>>>> TAG review status 
>>>>
>>>> Declined 
>>>> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/724#issuecomment-2234828340>
>>>>
>>>> Summary 
>>>>
>>>> We are landing the following change to the Attribution Reporting API 
>>>> focused on:
>>>>
>>>>    - 
>>>>    
>>>>    Removing aggregatable report limit when trigger context ID is 
>>>>    non-null
>>>>    
>>>>
>>>> This change is based on API caller feedback and the need for being able 
>>>> to measure a higher number of conversion events for certain user flows.
>>>>
>>>> Currently the API has a limit that allows up to 20 aggregatable reports 
>>>> to be generated per source registration which is restrictive for use cases 
>>>> where a user may have a longer user journey. This change removes the 
>>>> aggregatable report limit when a trigger context ID is provided as part of 
>>>> the registration. 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you expand a bit on what this limit is protecting against, and why 
>>>> it's fine to remove it when there's a non-null context ID? What are the 
>>>> tradeoffs here?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Since the presence or absence of an attribution report leaks some 
>>> potentially sensitive cross-site data, the browser will add noise to hide 
>>> the true number of reports by randomly sending noisy null reports for some 
>>> fraction of trigger registrations (see explainer 
>>> <https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/blob/main/AGGREGATE.md#hide-the-true-number-of-attribution-reports>
>>> ).
>>> The limit on the number of aggregatable reports per source is to limit 
>>> the abuse of the protection. 
>>>
>>> When the trigger context ID is specified, the browser will 
>>> unconditionally send an aggregatable report, either a real report or a null 
>>> report, therefore it fully protects the true number of reports and the 
>>> limit is unncecessary.
>>>
>>>>   
>>>>
>>>> The removal of this limit is restricted to only when the trigger 
>>>> context ID is specified, because when it is specified the API applies a 
>>>> higher rate of null reports which helps to protect against cross-site 
>>>> information leaking through report counts.
>>>>
>>>> Additionally, aggregatable reports will still be bound by other limits 
>>>> that restrict the total amount of information that can be measured, such 
>>>> as 
>>>> the L1 contribution budget (65,536) per source and the attribution rate 
>>>> limit.
>>>>
>>>> Explainer/Spec changes 
>>>>    
>>>>    1. 
>>>>    
>>>>    Explainer & Spec: https://github.com/WICG/attribution-reporting-api/
>>>>    pull/1475
>>>>    
>>>>
>>>> Risks
>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>>
>>>> This change is not a fully backwards compatible change. There’s no API 
>>>> surface change, but it can cause the API to behave differently given the 
>>>> same set of inputs. The API caller may receive more aggregatable reports 
>>>> if 
>>>> they use the trigger context ID feature, whereas previously if they tried 
>>>> to generate more than 20 aggregatable reports for a given source 
>>>> registration, then any reports beyond 20 would be rejected and not 
>>>> generated. This change is unlikely to cause any issues for API callers 
>>>> given they will still be able to receive the reports they currently 
>>>> receive 
>>>> without any changes. Additionally, this feature does not break any 
>>>> pre-existing API or web functionality.
>>>>
>>>> Gecko: No signal (Original request: https://github.com/mozilla/
>>>> standards-positions/issues/791)
>>>>
>>>> WebKit: No signal (Original request: https://github.com/WebKit/
>>>> standards-positions/issues/180)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WebView application risks 
>>>>
>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>
>>>> No
>>>>
>>>>               
>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>
>>>> This feature is expected to be supported in Android WebView in the 
>>>> future alongside Android platform support. 
>>>> <https://developers.google.com/privacy-sandbox/private-advertising/attribution-reporting/android>
>>>>
>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> No, currently this feature is not covered in WPT due to difficulty of 
>>>> adding significant coverage for Attribution Reporting API because of 
>>>> API-mandated delays and noise. However, the feature is covered by 
>>>> comprehensive integration tests (commonly referred to as “interop tests”) 
>>>> that are also reusable by other implementations. 
>>>>
>>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>>
>>>> This feature is anticipated to ship as part of Chrome M134 
>>>> <https://chromiumdash.appspot.com/schedule>. 
>>>>
>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5079048977645568
>>>>
>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions 
>>>>
>>>> Previous I2S: 
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2Rmj5V6FSaY>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M117 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/nWF61c8xu-M/m/uMmH1ewcAQAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M118 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/Mh-mJiyJZFk/m/HlgzpphYBQAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M119 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/6e44SBtEtcQ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M120 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/jSk3xpNPzGQ/m/VZPsdYgGCAAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M121 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/g9KiC6Rg_mA/m/V679WcWuAQAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M123 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/NE7VGke1Bjc/m/bIX00t4CAAAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M124 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/aregp1li6xk/m/IhBB2z8tBQAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M125 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/9UyhI6SRyxM/m/zgWWckgWAQAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M126 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/7UQR2lPn5KE/m/q_kL6ZiJDgAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M127 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/LAgnyPsJyJg?pli=1>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M128 (1) 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/qlsv7fn0zRE/m/SK8upePCCAAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M128 (2) 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/VKGn41wMYlg/m/VsNXktqvCAAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M130 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/-K2xDYuvmmA/m/Fhp564I7AgAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M132 (1) 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/T6i4a_hNeXk/m/Z1WwZTZMAAAJ>
>>>>
>>>> Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting features M132 (2) 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/pc6n8o-S_Ns/m/sWah9fSmAQAJ>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/
>>>> chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9910bd89-51a5-4766-b3b7-
>>>> afd0412ff602n%40chromium.org 
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/9910bd89-51a5-4766-b3b7-afd0412ff602n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ba5863c0-4b49-4204-8940-be08d3f90f8fn%40chromium.org
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/ba5863c0-4b49-4204-8940-be08d3f90f8fn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2BVrgPkP9cM5izDEU-T7jtC%3D-VYdK6cPW00uP62DnD%3Dk-w67iA%40mail.gmail.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CA%2BVrgPkP9cM5izDEU-T7jtC%3D-VYdK6cPW00uP62DnD%3Dk-w67iA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/cc51d379-751c-43d3-a73d-78bda9fb8c51n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to