Firefox has been implemented and is waiting to be shipped.
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1876148

在2024年9月4日星期三 UTC+8 04:53:19<Chris Harrelson> 写道:

> Thanks!
>
> LGTM1
>
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:41 AM Adam Klein <ad...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 11:31 AM Chris Harrelson <chri...@google.com> 
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2024 at 10:37 AM Adam Klein <ad...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Contact emailsecmzi...@chromium.org, jkum...@chromium.org, 
>>>> ad...@chromium.org
>>>>
>>>> Explainer
>>>> https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-string-builtins/blob/main/proposals/js-string-builtins/Overview.md
>>>>
>>>> Specificationhttps://webassembly.github.io/js-string-builtins/js-api/
>>>>
>>>> Summary
>>>>
>>>> This feature exposes common JS string operations for easy import into 
>>>> WebAssembly and optimizations thereof. This allows creating and 
>>>> manipulating JS strings from WebAssembly without native support within 
>>>> WebAssembly while still allowing for a similar performance as native 
>>>> string 
>>>> references. The mechanism works by exposing suitably strict versions of JS 
>>>> string operations in the WebAssembly JS API. These can be imported by 
>>>> modules using externref as a generic data type for storing the strings. 
>>>> The 
>>>> engine can identify that these imports can be represented by native graph 
>>>> operators without the need for calling into JS. This leads to a comparable 
>>>> peak performance as native string operations while allowing quick 
>>>> interoperability with JS since no copying at the boundary is required when 
>>>> calling into arbitrary JS functions that consume strings.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blink componentBlink>JavaScript>WebAssembly 
>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EJavaScript%3EWebAssembly>
>>>>
>>>> TAG reviewhttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/940
>>>>
>>>> TAG review statusCompleted (with "Resolution: satisfied")
>>>>
>>>> Chromium Trial NameWebAssemblyJSStringBuiltins
>>>>
>>>> Link to origin trial feedback summary
>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zL9goDsawTQUFuuQ8ddI_pUcLY1_iFOsHaDZ374dnGw/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>
>>>> Origin Trial documentation link
>>>> https://github.com/WebAssembly/js-string-builtins/blob/main/proposals/js-string-builtins/Overview.md
>>>>
>>>> Risks
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>
>>>> This proposal is at Phase 4 in the WebAssembly spec process
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> *Gecko*: Positive
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a standards position issue tracking this?
>>>
>>
>> I don't believe so. The proposal is championed by Ryan Hunt of Mozilla, 
>> who works on WebAssembly in SpiderMonkey. In order to reach Phase 4, the 
>> proposal needed two web engine implementations, and Firefox nightly has 
>> support for it, alongside Chrome.
>>  
>>
>>>  
>>>
>>>>
>>>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>>>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/343)
>>>>
>>>> *Web developers*: Positive (see OT feedback)
>>>>
>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>
>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>
>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Debuggability
>>>>
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>> Mac, Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>>>
>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>> ?Yes
>>>>
>>>> Flag name on chrome://flagsNone
>>>>
>>>> Finch feature nameWebAssemblyJSStringBuiltins
>>>>
>>>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>>>
>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>> Shipping on desktop 130
>>>> Origin trial desktop first 119
>>>> Origin trial desktop last 127
>>>> Origin trial extension 1 end milestone 130
>>>> Shipping on Android 130
>>>> Shipping on WebView 130
>>>>
>>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>>
>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or 
>>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues 
>>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may 
>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>> of 
>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>> None
>>>>
>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/6695587390423040?gate=6542541230440448
>>>>
>>>> Links to previous Intent discussionsIntent to Experiment: 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPAU7RyzxKa0Pj6q7B_jyfT%3DH%2BSK264%3Dx8wn1ans%3D8UjHRhctQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> Intent to Extend Experiment 1: 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra_16woqtqCWOW7Gr4uy2iX3hvj3iSYXQWZaVOc9q9e1Nw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAEvLGc%2BP1ZN9pOGTR_83vqT7JbQVyyoZ-At5qK0sv_f0FVxnJg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAEvLGc%2BP1ZN9pOGTR_83vqT7JbQVyyoZ-At5qK0sv_f0FVxnJg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/26fc12ff-7795-4fca-9153-d286afadc68cn%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to