LGTM2

On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 1:19 AM Domenic Denicola <dome...@chromium.org>
wrote:

> I'm very excited to see this work proceeding and am looking forward to
> being able to LGTM. A few requests before we get there:
>
>    - From what I understand we still won't be spec-compliant
>    for android:, drivefs:, steam:, chromeos-steam:, and materialized-view:.
>    Can you add failing web platform tests for all of those cases, to ensure
>    that we capture this non-compliance?
>    - I don't understand the role of the scheme registry after we ship
>    this change. What will it do? The doc says "(TBD) Remove the Scheme
>    Registry. This can be yet another non-trivial project. This document does
>    not cover this task." Are there still web-exposed behaviors between
>    non-registered and registered schemes? Is there a danger that people will
>    add more schemes to the registry and cause URL parsing to change? Or is
>    this purely about code cleanup as after this change the scheme registry is
>    a no-op?
>    - In general it would be great to have a section of the doc covering
>    future work, such as fixing those exceptional schemes, removing the scheme
>    registry, and anything else that you have in mind. In particular I'm
>    interested in which of these future work projects have compat impacts so we
>    can know how web developers might see URL parsing change in the future.
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 4:28 PM Hayato Ito <hay...@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> I've added a new section, "Compatibility Risks
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LjxHl32fE4tCKugrK_PIso7mfXQVEeoD1wSnX2y0ZU8/edit?resourcekey=0-d1gP4X2sG7GPl9mlTeptIA&tab=t.0#heading=h.kb3fb29h4kax>",
>> to the doc, organizing the content more clearly.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 9, 2024 at 3:03 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
>> yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for working on this!!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 8, 2024 at 10:09 AM Hayato Ito <hay...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Contact emails
>>>>
>>>> hay...@chromium.org
>>>>
>>>> Explainer
>>>>
>>>> http://bit.ly/url-non-special
>>>>
>>>> Specification
>>>>
>>>> https://url.spec.whatwg.org/ <https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#url-parsing>
>>>>
>>>> Summary
>>>>
>>>> Support non-special scheme URLs.
>>>>
>>>> Previously, Chromium's URL parser didn't handle non-special scheme URLs
>>>> properly. It treated these URLs as “opaque paths”, which didn’t align with
>>>> the URL Standard.
>>>>
>>>> Now, Chromium’s URL parser correctly processes non-special URLs.
>>>>
>>>> Examples:
>>>>
>>>> Before:
>>>>
>>>> > const url = new URL("git://host/path");
>>>>
>>>> > url.host
>>>>
>>>> ""
>>>>
>>>> > url.pathname
>>>>
>>>> "//host/path"
>>>>
>>>> > url.host = "newhost";
>>>>
>>>> > url.host
>>>>
>>>> ""
>>>>
>>>> > const url = new URL("git://a b/path");
>>>>
>>>> > url.pathname
>>>>
>>>> "//a b/path"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> After:
>>>>
>>>> > const url = new URL("git://host/path");
>>>>
>>>> > url.host
>>>>
>>>> "host"
>>>>
>>>> > url.pathname
>>>>
>>>> "/path"
>>>>
>>>> > url.host = "newhost";
>>>>
>>>> > url.host
>>>>
>>>> "newhost"
>>>>
>>>> > url.href
>>>>
>>>> "git://newhost/path"
>>>>
>>>> > const url = new URL("git://a b/path");
>>>>
>>>> => throws Exception. // A space character is not allowed as a hostname.
>>>>
>>>> See http://bit.ly/url-non-special for more details.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As part of our Interop 2024 efforts, this change delivers the following
>>>> improvements:
>>>>
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    Boosts WPT URL Score: 936 previously failing subtests in the WPT
>>>>    URL tests (link
>>>>    
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LjxHl32fE4tCKugrK_PIso7mfXQVEeoD1wSnX2y0ZU8/edit?resourcekey=0-d1gP4X2sG7GPl9mlTeptIA&tab=t.0#heading=h.ji1rj1k19sgh>)
>>>>    now pass, raising the score from 87.0% to 94.7%.
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    Fixes code relying on incorrect URL behavior: 527 tests  (link
>>>>    
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Pqw1iKXK_lxHj-kLIAeRFs-khFz-BPZDio1W7SgEVE4/edit?usp=sharing>)
>>>>    and related code in Chromium that depended on the previous behavior are 
>>>> now
>>>>    fixed or mitigated, including:
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>       Web tests that relied on non-compliant non-special URL behavior
>>>>       (e.g. “javascript://a b” URL)
>>>>       -
>>>>
>>>>       Non-special schemes used internally by Chromium code base,
>>>>       including ChromeOS (e.g. “steam:”, “materialized-view://”, 
>>>> “cros-apps://”)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blink component
>>>>
>>>> Internals>Network
>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Internals%3ENetwork>
>>>>
>>>> TAG review
>>>>
>>>> Not applicable
>>>>
>>>> Risks
>>>>
>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>>
>>>> Since Safari and Firefox already support non-special scheme URLs, the
>>>> likelihood of public websites breaking due to this change is likely low.
>>>> See here
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LjxHl32fE4tCKugrK_PIso7mfXQVEeoD1wSnX2y0ZU8/edit?resourcekey=0-d1gP4X2sG7GPl9mlTeptIA&tab=t.0>
>>>> for a rough estimation of the non-special scheme URL usages.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Any particular section in that doc that talks through or estimates the
>>> compat risk?
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Gecko: Shipped
>>>>
>>>> WebKit: Shipped
>>>>
>>>> Web developers:  Generally seems positive.
>>>>
>>>> Some signals (from interop 2024 discussions
>>>> <https://github.com/web-platform-tests/interop/issues/424>) are:
>>>>
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    > Confusion because URL parsers across Blink, Gecko, WebKit, Node,
>>>>    and Deno do not interop well. The root cause is nearly always parser 
>>>> bugs
>>>>    in Blink or Gecko:
>>>>    https://twitter.com/oleg008/status/1699087223751073883
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    > URL is very widely used - custom schemes are commonly used for
>>>>    links to native apps, or when dealing with developer tooling like
>>>>    databases. They may also become exceedingly more common with import 
>>>> maps.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Other potential risks and assessments:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    Enterprise usage: It's difficult to predict how non-special URLs
>>>>    are used in the wild, especially by enterprise customers with in-house
>>>>    apps. While adding an Enterprise Policy was considered to mitigate 
>>>> risks,
>>>>    technical limitations make it difficult to support URLs. See
>>>>    http://bit.ly/url-non-special for more info. We'll disable the
>>>>    feature with Finch (StandardCompliantNonSpecialSchemeURLParsing flag) in
>>>>    case this causes serious issues.
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    Impacts on well-known non-special schemes: See here
>>>>    
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LjxHl32fE4tCKugrK_PIso7mfXQVEeoD1wSnX2y0ZU8/edit?resourcekey=0-d1gP4X2sG7GPl9mlTeptIA&tab=t.0#heading=h.k3rirdjyomw6>
>>>>    for the impacts on “javascript://”, “data:”, and so on.
>>>>    -
>>>>
>>>>    Impacts on dependent components: This change affects components
>>>>    relying on URL behavior, like Origin
>>>>    <https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#origin>. See the Security section
>>>>    below.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Security
>>>>
>>>> In Chromium, GURL, KURL, and web-facing URL APIs share the common URL
>>>> parser backends, which reside in //url. As a result, this web-facing change
>>>> will also affect core components like url::Origin, kurl::SecurityOrigin.
>>>>
>>>> For detailed information on how url::Origin, kurl::SecurityOrigin, and
>>>> web-facing url.origin are impacted, please refer to this CL’s
>>>> description
>>>> <https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5309015>.
>>>>
>>>> TL;DR. This is a complex issue due to historical reasons. While most
>>>> components remain unaffected, there are some nuances, particularly
>>>> regarding the “Android WebView Hack”. We’ve preserved the current Origin
>>>> behavior for Android WebView.
>>>>
>>>> WebView application risks
>>>>
>>>> Beyond the aforementioned "Android WebView Hack", there are no other
>>>> changes specific to WebView.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?
>>>>
>>>> Yes.
>>>>
>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>> ?
>>>>
>>>> Yes (dashboard
>>>> <https://wpt.fyi/results/url?label=master&label=experimental&product=chrome&product=firefox&product=safari&aligned&view=interop&q=label%3Ainterop-2023-url>
>>>> )
>>>>
>>>> Flag name
>>>>
>>>> StandardCompliantNonSpecialSchemeURLParsing
>>>>
>>>> Requires code in //chrome?
>>>>
>>>> False
>>>>
>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>
>>>> https://crbug.com/1416006
>>>>
>>>> Estimated milestones
>>>>
>>>> M130
>>>>
>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>>>
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5201116810182656
>>>>
>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions
>>>>
>>>> Previous I2S
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/wYuPrIQzDTA/m/uoL4bXR2BgAJ>.
>>>> The previous I2S mail was sent last year but please consider this
>>>> intent to ship as a new one.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Hayato
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFpjS_1_R%3D%2BHXYgTCuLD_WGR0foLKVnxAU9am1QbHyAZ%3D%2B3Ohw%40mail.gmail.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFpjS_1_R%3D%2BHXYgTCuLD_WGR0foLKVnxAU9am1QbHyAZ%3D%2B3Ohw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Hayato
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFpjS_1%3D48YmdprXVdy_3SWRqneFFcy6BRuaw_w%2BxvrjyAc2CA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFpjS_1%3D48YmdprXVdy_3SWRqneFFcy6BRuaw_w%2BxvrjyAc2CA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra9m1qFkKLjKPu3B-fQMtvf0acXo3YGhZTWGeQcAgh-MVg%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAM0wra9m1qFkKLjKPu3B-fQMtvf0acXo3YGhZTWGeQcAgh-MVg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOMQ%2Bw9p8_a308ju2BwjGkx40MBud-QWMZuHd8W9CaCABjY8pQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to