Friendly ping on the above questions! :)

On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 6:18 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) <
yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Do I understand correctly that this would partially align us with Firefox
> (modulo the crash), and take us away from WebKit interoperability?
>
> If so, it'd be good to understand if:
> * There is interest from developers in this
> * WebKit is planning to follow
> * This has low compat risk (in terms of current sites relying on this
> value not being null somehow)
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 2:52 AM eui-sa...@samsung.com <
> eui-sang....@samsung.com> wrote:
>
>> >  Would you mind explaining why this is a useful addition for
>> developers? Or is the motivation improved spec compliance?
>>
>> In both perspectives. The CSS OM spec was fixed because it was not
>> matched with the spec of @import in css-cascade. The behaviour of
>> CSSImportRule is not following @import.
>>
>>
>> > Can you request a signal? https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions
>>
>> Sure, I filed an issue.
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/325
>>
>>
>> > All of these tests are passing right now - will you be adding new tests?
>>
>> Yes, I will add new tests in
>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/cssom/cssimportrule.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>> I am working on it.
>>
>> https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5065830/8/third_party/blink/web_tests/external/wpt/css/cssom/cssimportrule.html
>>
>> On Sunday, February 25, 2024 at 7:14:59 AM UTC+9 mike...@chromium.org
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/23/24 8:31 AM, Amos Lim wrote:
>>>
>>> Contact emails eui-sa...@samsung.com
>>>
>>> Explainer None
>>>
>>> Would you mind explaining why this is a useful addition for developers?
>>> Or is the motivation improved spec compliance?
>>>
>>>
>>> Specification
>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom/#the-cssimportrule-interface
>>>
>>> Summary
>>>
>>> Allow CSSImportRule.styleSheet to be nullable. The styleSheet attribute
>>> in CSSImportRule can be null if there is no associated CSS style sheet.
>>>
>>>
>>> Blink component Blink>CSS
>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ECSS>
>>>
>>> TAG review None
>>>
>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>
>>> Risks
>>>
>>>
>>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping
>>>
>>> *WebKit*: No signal
>>>
>>> Can you request a signal? https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions
>>>
>>>
>>> *Web developers*: No signals
>>>
>>> *Other signals*:
>>>
>>> WebView application risks
>>>
>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such
>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Debuggability
>>>
>>> None
>>>
>>>
>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>>> Linux, ChromeOS, Android, and Android WebView)? No
>>>
>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>> ? Yes
>>>
>>>
>>> https://wpt.fyi/results/css/cssom/cssimportrule.html?label=experimental&label=master&aligned
>>>
>>> All of these tests are passing right now - will you be adding new tests?
>>>
>>>
>>> Flag name on chrome://flags
>>>
>>> Finch feature name CSSImportRuleStyleSheetNullable
>>>
>>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>>
>>> Tracking bug https://issues.chromium.org/issues/40266154
>>>
>>> Estimated milestones
>>> Shipping on desktop 124
>>> Shipping on Android 124
>>> Shipping on WebView 124
>>>
>>> Anticipated spec changes
>>>
>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>> None
>>>
>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5123480866783232
>>>
>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status
>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>
>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOGEg03EdbMR2-x-7taf692_FmX4%2BwBMgFW%2BwaZiM7gs1Zo5-Q%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOGEg03EdbMR2-x-7taf692_FmX4%2BwBMgFW%2BwaZiM7gs1Zo5-Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/bc77a62d-a28b-4111-91a7-aea76bc5a135n%40chromium.org
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/bc77a62d-a28b-4111-91a7-aea76bc5a135n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAOmohSJyjda9u4FFROqUiZByv9vg6mUu9X43qvxWdv3MkeXLZg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to