On Fri, Nov 17, 2023 at 12:28 AM Mike Taylor <miketa...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Noam, > > Ack on the OT bugs (been there...); could you comment on any substantial > progress in the following areas: > > - Draft spec (early draft is ok, but must be spec-like and associated > with the appropriate standardization venue, or WICG) > > Not there yet. We wanted to see if the OT was bringing out things that would change the API substantially. So far seems like it doesn't, and writing a draft spec is one of the next things on my agenda. > > - TAG review (see exceptions) > > Posted and assigned, pending: h ttps://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/911 > > - bit.ly/blink-signals requests > > Got very good informal signs from the other vendors at TPAC and in other informal conversations. I wanted to wait for a couple of the happy OT participants to provide case studies before I ask for an official standard position. This is also next on the agenda. > > - Outreach for feedback from the spec community > > Was discussed several times at WebPerfWG with very good feedback. Can share the link to meeting minutes if requested. > > - WPT tests > > Very comprehensive: https://wpt.fyi/results/long-animation-frame/tentative?label=experimental&label=master&aligned -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAJn%3DMYZB3BpJyY5bVrcqTznC1zC0qi5s1O_VVjLyUbB14Pq%2BMA%40mail.gmail.com.
