Are there any spec changes planned for this feature? I'm not sure if the
README linked under Specification is meant to make it into WHATWG, maybe to
close out https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/7189

The only spec I could find about CCNS is
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9111#section-5.2.1.5, so I'm not sure how
to reconcile possibly contradicting language in the specs

Thanks!
vmpstr

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 2:32 AM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:

> I just discussed this with Fergal offline:
>
>    - The risky scenario is one where revocation of sensitive info
>    (logout, access revoked) happens on the server-side only without a
>    client-side update.
>    - In such a scenario on a shared computer, someone could back-button
>    their way into someone else's sensitive info.
>    - It might be interesting to talk to security folks (and maybe Project
>    Zero folks) to see if this is not happening already with content that's not
>    CCNS decorated.
>    - It would be good to run a survey of potentially-sensitive services
>    and try to get a signal from them on how many of them are properly doing
>    revocation on the client side.
>       - I'd love ideas on how we can scale such a survey beyond manual
>       inspection of a few known services.
>    - It could be interesting to try and ship a version of this with a
>    shorter timeout, to minimize the risk of users leaving the machine
>    unattended.
>       - If we go that route, it'd be good to think through how we'd be
>       able to increase that timeout over time, after gaining more confidence 
> that
>       the risky scenario isn't happening in the wild.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 2:36 AM Jason Robbins <jrobb...@google.com> wrote:
>
>> At this morning's API Owners meeting, they asked me to add all review
>> gate types to all of the "web developer facing code change" features that
>> are currently under review, including this one.  So, I have added Privacy,
>> Security, Enterprise, Debuggability, and Testing gates to your feature
>> entry.
>>
>> Please click the gate chips in the "Prepare to ship" stage on your
>> feature detail page.  For each one, answer survey questions and request
>> that of the cross-functional review.  You can request them all in
>> parallel.  In cases where you already have the go/launch
>> <https://goto.google.com/launch> bit approved, you can note that in a
>> comment on that gate for a potentially faster review.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> jason!
>> On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 9:09:18 AM UTC-7 Jason Robbins wrote:
>>
>>> On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 1:01:54 PM UTC-7 Chris Harrelson wrote:
>>>
>>> Please also make sure to complete all of the other shipping gate reviews
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/bqvB1oap0Yc/m/YlO8DEHgAQAJ>
>>> .
>>>
>>>
>>> I think a bug in ChromeStatus may have caused some confusion on this
>>> feature entry.  The feature entry has type "Web developer facing code
>>> change", so its bilnk-dev thread should have had subject line prefix
>>> "Web-facing change PSA" rather than "Intent to ship".  And, according to
>>> the launching-features doc
>>> <https://www.chromium.org/blink/launching-features/#psa-prepare-to-ship>,
>>> it does not require any approvals, which is why there are no other gates
>>> offered in the ChromeStatus UI.  A fix for that subject-line prefix bug
>>> should go live today.
>>>
>>> Of course, the point of a PSA is to allow concerns to be raised and I
>>> see that this is a very active thread.  So, all that should be worked
>>> through.  Its a mater of the the API Owners prerogative to request any
>>> other reviews that they think are appropriate, but it is not automatically
>>> required by the process for this feature type.  Also, I see that the launch
>>> entry <https://launch.corp.google.com/launch/4251651> had some
>>> approvals.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> jason!
>>>
>> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "blink-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUszpq%3DS%3DOZ4k_GnopJMRcTnL_trq5iF8J-kAzeYEiqKA%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfUszpq%3DS%3DOZ4k_GnopJMRcTnL_trq5iF8J-kAzeYEiqKA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CADsXd2N%3D8aFFuhY6xHxK3CjGnYe-JM_vpKFuZkVkOFf0C7Me7g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to