On Sun, Aug 20, 2023 at 7:36 PM Yoav Weiss <yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote:

> Thanks for working on this!! Eliminating resources which can't be loaded
> as CORS enabled resources is super useful!
>
> On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 11:28 PM Dale Curtis <dalecur...@chromium.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Contact emailsdalecur...@chromium.org
>>
>> ExplainerNone
>>
>> Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/SVG
>>
>> Summary
>>
>> Implements the crossOrigin attribute for SVG images: The crossOrigin
>> attribute, valid on the <image> and <feImage> elements, provides support
>> for configuration of the Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) requests for
>> the element's fetched data. The supported values are the same as elsewhere:
>> "anonymous", "use-credentials", and "" (which means anonymous).
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Attribute/crossorigin
>> https://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/embedded.html#ImageElementCrossoriginAttribute
>>
>>
>> Blink componentBlink>SVG
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ESVG>
>>
>> Search tagssvg <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:svg>, crossorigin
>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:crossorigin>, image
>> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:image>
>>
>> TAG reviewNone
>>
>> TAG review statusNot applicable
>>
>> Risks
>>
>>
>> Interoperability and Compatibility
>>
>> None
>>
>
> I believe content that already has a crossorigin attribute, but where the
> servers didn't send ACAO would now be blocked.
> Can we add a usecounter for that case, and monitor it as part of the
> rollout?
>

>
>>
>> *Gecko*: Shipped/Shipping (
>> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/SVG/Attribute/crossorigin#browser_compatibility
>> )
>>
>
> According to MDN, that's a fairly recent change. Do you know if it ran
> into any compat issues?
>

I don't. Nothing is called out on the implementation issue:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1240357

+longs...@gmail.com who authored the Firefox change in case they want to
weigh in.


>
>
>>
>> *WebKit*: No signal (
>> https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/241)
>>
>> *Web developers*: Positive
>>
>> *Other signals*:
>>
>> Security
>>
>> The default value of the crossOrigin attribute is "anonymous", both
>> Safari and Chrome currently treat the missing attribute as "no cors". Due
>> to the default value change, content that was previously inaccessible
>> and/or tainted will become accessible without site/developer involvement if
>> the server was already supplying the correct Access-Control-Allow-Origin
>> header.
>>
>
fs pointed out that this is confusingly worded. I've rephrased it as:
"Content that was previously inaccessible and/or tainted will become
accessible without site/developer involvement if the client side element
has a crossOrigin attribute and the server was already supplying the
correct Access-Control-Allow-Origin header."


>
>>
>> WebView application risks
>>
>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that
>> it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> Debuggability
>>
>> None
>>
>>
>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, Mac,
>> Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?Yes
>>
>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>> ?Yes
>>
>
> Link to wpt.fyi that shows Firefox passing the tests currently?
>

Hmm, I linked to them on the chromestatus entry, I guess it doesn't include
them here:
https://wpt.fyi/results/svg/embedded/image-crossorigin.sub.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned
https://wpt.fyi/results/webcodecs/videoFrame-construction.crossOriginSource.sub.html?label=master&label=experimental&aligned


>
>
>>
>>
>> Flag name on chrome://flagsNone
>>
>> Finch feature nameSvgCrossOriginAttribute
>>
>> Non-finch justification
>>
>> Minor attribute addition.
>>
>>
>> Requires code in //chrome?False
>>
>> Tracking bughttps://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=842321
>>
>> Launch bughttps://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=842321
>>
>> Estimated milestones
>> Shipping on desktop 118
>> Shipping on Android 118
>>
>> Anticipated spec changes
>>
>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat or
>> interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github issues
>> in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution may
>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure of
>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>> None
>>
>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5109030850134016
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "blink-dev" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPUDrwdovYUciES4qqjJ3PckFOvc_6yzBVn_b4uKyuA9xwbv6Q%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPUDrwdovYUciES4qqjJ3PckFOvc_6yzBVn_b4uKyuA9xwbv6Q%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPUDrwe2CjFynQXVEcbtHTa%2BxWZMdJTZytv8Fiiyc5NQsQpkYA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to