Thanks for working on this!! (and iterating on the solution based on
feedback)

On Tue, Jul 18, 2023 at 4:23 AM Ming-Ying Chung <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> We plan to prototype the fetchLater API, which is the successor of the
> previous PendingBeacon API (intent to prototype mail
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/tPTRZkSmlbg/m/5vGhjrEsAgAJ>,
> intent to OT mail
> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/ZCVcUEYzVHs/m/3PjKPLmkAQAJ>).
> The fetchLater API is the result of discussion
> <https://github.com/WICG/pending-beacon/issues/70> with users and other
> browser vendors.
>
> Contact [email protected]
> [email protected]
> [email protected]
>
> Explainer
> https://github.com/WICG/pending-beacon/blob/main/docs/fetch-later-api.md
>
> Chromium Design Doc
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U8XSnICPY3j-fjzG35UVm6zjwL6LvX6ETU3T8WrzLyQ
>
> Specification
> https://whatpr.org/fetch/1647/094ea69...152d725.html#fetch-later-method (draft
> PR)
>
> Summary
>
> fetchLater() is a JavaScript API to request a deferred fetch. Once
> requested, the deferred request is queued by the browser, and will be
> invoked in one of the following scenarios:
>
>    - The document is destroyed.
>    - The document is bfcached and not restored after a certain time.
>
> The API returns a FetchLaterResult that contains a boolean field sent that
> may be updated to tell whether the deferred request has been sent out or
> not. On successful sending, the whole response will be ignored, including
> body and headers. Nothing at all should be processed or updated, as the
> page is already gone.
>
> Note that from the point of view of the API user, the exact send time is
> unknown.
>
> Blink componentBlink>Network>FetchAPI
> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component%3ABlink%3ENetwork%3EFetchAPI>
>
> Motivation
>
> Web developers have a need for ‘beaconing’ - that is, sending a bundle of
> data to a backend server, without expecting a particular response, ideally
> at the ‘end’ of a user’s visit to a page. Existing beacon APIs are all
> based around a developer constructing and sending a beacon, and there's no
> good time for that "send" call to be made.
>
>
> This API delegates the sending to the browser itself, so it can support
> requests on page unload or on page hide, without the developer having to
> implement send calls at exactly the right times.
>
> Initial public proposal
> https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-stateful-javascript-page-unload-beacon-api/5776
>
> TAG review
> TAG review statusPending
> <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/776> (for PendingBeacon,
> not fetchLater)
>
> Risks
>
>
> Interoperability and Compatibility
>
>
> Gecko: Pending <https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/703>
>
> WebKit: Supportive
> <https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/85>
>
> Web developers: No signals
>
> Other signals:
>
> WebView application risks
>
> No
>
> Debuggability
>
> fetchLater requests should be shown in the DevTool's network tab, similar
> to other network requests.
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ?Not yet. But there are tests for PendingBeacon to convert from.
>
> Flag nameFetchLaterAPI
>
> Requires code in //chrome?False
>
> Estimated milestones
>
> No milestones specified
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5690553554436096 (old entry for
> PendingBeacon API)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfWnfOwJjU9yG47FM3u0O1XuzjCiRutiHFpE2QCw3Mqf%3Dg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to