LGTM3

On Tuesday, July 4, 2023 at 10:15:12 AM UTC+2 Koji Ishii wrote:

> Thank you Larry for the feedback.
>
> By "typographic styling efforts" do you mean other CSS features? If yes, 
> thank you for pointing that out, I'll look into them for possible 
> relationships with this feature.
>
> When I wrote "other implementations", I meant "other browsers," as they 
> may take different tradeoffs and get different feedback from their users. 
> Sorry for not being clear, but I agree both should be investigated for 
> improving typography more. Thank you.
>
> On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 4:04 AM 'Larry LACa' via blink-dev <
> blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote:
>
>> @ko..  Re: other implementations. 
>> There are a number of typographic styling efforts.  E.g. CSS-Pseudo-4
>> CSS-Pseudo-4 | w3.org <https://www.w3.org/TR/css-pseudo-4/>
>>
>> On Sunday, July 2, 2023 at 11:44:54 PM UTC-7 ko...@chromium.org wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you Alex for the feedback. Replied to the doc.
>>>
>>> In short, I'm supportive of giving more controls to authors, to achieve 
>>> a more similar level of the typography as LaTeX. There are multiple ideas 
>>> how to do it in a world where multiple implementations exist. I think it 
>>> will need further author feedback, experiences from other implementations, 
>>> and discussions at the CSSWG.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 12:58 AM Alex Russell <sligh...@chromium.org> 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Have followed up again in the design doc. Would like to make sure that 
>>>> multiple (potentially competing) values for `text-wrap` have clear 
>>>> precedence and that we have a plan for adding new values (e.g., for full 
>>>> LaTeX flow for printing).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks again.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>>
>>>> Alex
>>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, June 28, 2023 at 8:49:36 AM UTC-7 Daniel Bratell wrote:
>>>>
>>> LGTM2
>>>>>
>>>>> /Daniel
>>>>> On 2023-06-28 16:57, Rick Byers wrote:
>>>>>
>>>> LGTM1
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 10:51 AM Koji Ishii <ko...@chromium.org> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Contact emails ko...@chromium.org
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Explainer None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specification 
>>>>>> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-text-4/#valdef-text-wrap-pretty
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Design docs 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jJFD8nAUuiUX6ArFZQqQo8yTsvg8IuAq7oFrNQxPeqI/edit?usp=sharing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Summary 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adjusts line breaking to avoid a short single word on the last line 
>>>>>> (also known as typographic orphans.) When `text-wrap: pretty` is 
>>>>>> specified, 
>>>>>> paragraphs that will end up with a short single word on the last line 
>>>>>> are 
>>>>>> adjusted so that the last line has two or more words. The algorithm is 
>>>>>> based on the Knuth-Plass algorithm, as used by TeX. It computes scores 
>>>>>> for 
>>>>>> all candidates, and chooses the best one. To balance between the 
>>>>>> typographic benefits and the performance impacts, it adjsuts the last 4 
>>>>>> lines of paragraphs that meet certain conditions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blink component Blink>Layout>Inline 
>>>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3ELayout%3EInline>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG review None
>>>>>>
>>>>>> TAG review status Not applicable
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Risks 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Low. This value only sets a bias for better layout over speed, 
>>>>>> without any particular requirements. Browsers that don't support this 
>>>>>> value 
>>>>>> will fall back to their default line breaking algorithm, but both the 
>>>>>> exact 
>>>>>> line breaking results for this value and for the default value are not 
>>>>>> defined.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Gecko*: Positive (
>>>>>> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630181)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *WebKit*: Positive (https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/672) 
>>>>>> This property is originally requested by an WebKit engineer.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Web developers*: Positive (
>>>>>> https://clagnut.com/blog/2424#:~:text=the%20specification%20is-,text%2Dwrap%3Apretty,-.%20If%20it%E2%80%99s%20ever)
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> When Blink shipped `text-wrap: balance` that improved headlines, many 
>>>>>> tweets and articles are seen on the web, wanting the feature to avoid a 
>>>>>> single word on the last line (typographic orphans) for body text. 
>>>>>> https://medium.com/swlh/typographic-orphans-on-the-web-266e32f756fe has 
>>>>>> a simple JS solution to avoid typographic orphans. 
>>>>>> https://github.com/robertknight/tex-linebreak is a JS implementation 
>>>>>> of the Knuth-Plass algorithm, has 111 stars.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Other signals*:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ergonomics 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another related value of this property `text-wrap: balance` improves 
>>>>>> line breaking for headlines, while this value improves typography for 
>>>>>> body 
>>>>>> text.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WebView application risks 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such 
>>>>>> that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> None.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Debuggability 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows, 
>>>>>> Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)? Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
>>>>>> ? Yes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Flag name 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Requires code in //chrome? False
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tracking bug 
>>>>>> https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1432798
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sample links 
>>>>>> https://output.jsbin.com/hopejeb
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Estimated milestones 
>>>>>> Shipping on desktop 117 
>>>>>> Shipping on Android 117 
>>>>>> Shipping on WebView 117 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anticipated spec changes 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Open questions about a feature may be a source of future web compat 
>>>>>> or interop issues. Please list open issues (e.g. links to known github 
>>>>>> issues in the project for the feature specification) whose resolution 
>>>>>> may 
>>>>>> introduce web compat/interop risk (e.g., changing to naming or structure 
>>>>>> of 
>>>>>> the API in a non-backward-compatible way).
>>>>>> None.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5145771917180928
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Links to previous Intent discussions 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
>>>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAHe_1dJHcCJ8TzS6nG27Uem_6keVwTgArBPtFzg29KHiUOPumQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAHe_1dJHcCJ8TzS6nG27Uem_6keVwTgArBPtFzg29KHiUOPumQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_Cexu-4srZ7cOKKYrpz6AGu7ed1xnFU7gBjiGmPLzmkg%40mail.gmail.com
>>>>>  
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAFUtAY_Cexu-4srZ7cOKKYrpz6AGu7ed1xnFU7gBjiGmPLzmkg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "blink-dev" group.
>>
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/63834b8b-a61f-4a00-b9ea-48c650ab2129n%40chromium.org
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/63834b8b-a61f-4a00-b9ea-48c650ab2129n%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fce13b38-c3c9-47de-a24f-0b5cb5cb5154n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to