**

       *Contact emails*

*

wanderv...@chromium.org <mailto:wanderv...@chromium.org>, m...@chromium.org <mailto:m...@chromium.org>, miketa...@chromium.org <mailto:miketa...@chromium.org>


       Explainer

https://github.com/wanderview/quota-storage-partitioning/blob/main/explainer.md <https://github.com/wanderview/quota-storage-partitioning/blob/main/explainer.md>


       Specification

We’re actively working on adding the relevant spec concepts with the following WIP PRs (there has been some extensive refactoring requested, so it’s taken longer than anticipated):


https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8447 <https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8447>

https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8036 <https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8036>

https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8027 <https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8027>

https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/144 <https://github.com/whatwg/storage/pull/144>


       Summary

We intend to partition a number of APIs in third-party contexts.  This effort is focused on partitioning APIs above the network stack.  This includes quota-managed storage, service workers, and communication APIs (such as BroadcastChannel).  See the explainer for more details:


https://github.com/wanderview/quota-storage-partitioning/blob/main/explainer.md <https://github.com/wanderview/quota-storage-partitioning/blob/main/explainer.md>


       Blink component

Blink>Storage <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EStorage>


       TAG review

Early Design Review https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/629 <https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/629>


       TAG review status

Closed as “Satisfied”


       Risks


       Interoperability and Compatibility


Gecko: Shipped/Shipping


WebKit: Shipped/Shipping


Web developers: Mixed signals


Other signals:


       WebView application risks

Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?


We’re still investigating the risk for WebView, and if we should ship in that context at a later date.


       Goals for Deprecation Trial


We propose to ship two separate deprecation trials, each for approximately one year (to give sites plenty of time to test and update, if  needed). Aspirationally, we would like to ship partitioned storage in M112, and our goal is to have a deprecation trial available from M111 to M123.


The first <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1404959>is a general-purpose deprecation trial that will allow a top-level site to opt into unpartitioned storage, service workers, and communication APIs for third-party contexts embedded in its site. This will give sites more time for testing and migrating to solutions that don’t require partitioned storage.


The second <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1399319>is tailored to a behavior we discovered during the dev-trial that is known to be used by the Firebase Auth library. This deprecation trial only allows for unpartitioned `sessionStorage` across a navigation (which is how the `signInWithRedirect()` method relies on storing and postMessage’ing authentication tokens). The Firebase team is aware of the issue (as it also affects Safari users; Firefox has worked around the breakage by granting unpartitioned storage via a shim <https://github.com/mozilla-extensions/webcompat-addon/blob/f58cf9e13b088fde01a0551069d23862e71e6711/src/data/shims.js#L791-L801>), and is working to migrate their users <https://firebase.google.com/docs/auth/web/redirect-best-practices>to cross-browser solutions that are compatible with partitioned storage. Given the different nature of the Firebase issue, we think it makes sense to ship a different deprecation trial entirely.


       Debuggability

DevTools has support <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1296581>for partitioned storage.



       Will this feature be supported on all six Blink platforms
       (Windows, Mac, Linux, Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView)?

Yes for all others; TBD for WebView.


       Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests
       
<https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?

Yes


       DevTrial instructions

https://developer.chrome.com/en/blog/storage-partitioning-dev-trial <https://developer.chrome.com/en/blog/storage-partitioning-dev-trial>


       Flag name

ThirdPartyStoragePartitioning

DisableThirdPartySessionStoragePartitioningAfterGeneralPartitioning


       Requires code in //chrome?

False


       Tracking bug

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1191114 <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1191114>


       Launch bug

https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1191709 <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1191709>


       Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status

https://chromestatus.com/feature/5723617717387264 <https://chromestatus.com/feature/5723617717387264>

*

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/d395956d-3a59-1ba9-1b5c-33505e1518d3%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to