On Mon, Dec 5, 2022 at 9:04 AM Weijar Z <weij...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I want to implement the feature  to automatically resume the recently read
> articles when I open the app.
> 1. the user opens the address "pwa.com/"
> 2. App automatically redirects to the last read article "
> pwa.com/articles/1"
> But when the user presses back, the app exits directly and it should go
> back to the article list page.
>
Thanks for raising this! From a user perspective, the browser's back button
not landing on the pwa.com's home page is aligned with their expectation
because the user did not visit the home page. A possible solution is for
pwa.com to have a custom back button inside the app, which when pressed can
invoke history.back() and that will take the user to the app's home page.

>
>
> On Saturday, 29 October 2022 at 03:09:49 UTC+8 shiva...@chromium.org
> wrote:
>
>> Apologies for the delay.
>>
>> 1. history list: [a.com, b.com]. none of the entries are skippable
>> because a.com got a click and b.com hasn't added any new entry yet.
>> 2. [a.com, b.com, b.com/entry1] again no entry should be skippable since
>> b.com got a user interaction.
>> 3. On reload, there should not be any change in the skippable state of
>> the entries as reloads do not interact with the intervention. Can you check
>> at this point if you long press on the back button, does it show b.com
>> or not.
>> 4. I wonder if there is something about the reload that only leads to one
>> b.com entry and therefore pressing the back button navigates to a.com.
>>
>> It would be better to create a crbug
>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/entry> for investigating
>> this and continue any follow up discussions on that.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 7:17 AM eyal sadeh <eyals...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello!
>>> I experience a use case where this intervention hurts user-experience,
>>> would love to hear your thoughts:
>>> 1. User is on a.com and clicks to go to b.com (Single Page Application).
>>> 2. The user interacts with the page, and a new history entry is created
>>> using pushState.
>>> 3. The user press the reload button (alternatively, in Android,
>>> sometimes the page reloads automatically).
>>> 4. The user press the back button, b.com is skipped, popstate event
>>> isn't triggered, and the user is being navigated to a.com.
>>>
>>> I feel this use case is valid and b.com shouldn't be skipped. I'd
>>> suggest to skip states only if added during the current session.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Eyal
>>>
>>> On Monday, June 7, 2021 at 7:40:03 PM UTC+3 mmo...@google.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> It sounds to me like requesting that Navigations initiated from
>>>> Notification handlers be treated as a user-gesture-initiated would be
>>>> enough to make this use case work correctly.  Filed: crbug.com/1217190 if
>>>> that is true.
>>>>
>>>> (The fact that you use history.replace first here likely should not
>>>> affect the situation.  So long as the subsequent history.push is treated as
>>>> gesture-initiated you should get the back button behaviour you ask for.)
>>>>
>>>> -Michal
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 7, 2021 at 11:11 AM Andrea Puddu <m...@nuragic.io> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> This "intervention" by Chrome is breaking a valid use case in our app
>>>>> (Progressive Web App).
>>>>>
>>>>> Specifically:
>>>>> - users click on a push notification (the app is in background)
>>>>> - notifications open a link, which is e.g. 
>>>>> *https://example.app/pwa?noticationId=12345
>>>>> <https://example.app/pwa?noticationId=12345>*
>>>>> - the PWA opens, it fetches the event associated from the
>>>>> *notificationId*, and redirect to the corresponding view
>>>>> - when users hit the back button we don't want the PWA to be closed
>>>>> immediately: it must redirect to the "home" first
>>>>>
>>>>> To do so, in the notification handler we do:
>>>>> *history.replace(homeURL);*
>>>>> * history.push(eventURL);*
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that this works perfectly fine in Safari, Firefox, etc. because
>>>>> well, it's just using standard APIs. Moreover, this is widely used pattern
>>>>> in native apps: when you click a notification it opens the app, but if you
>>>>> hit the "back button" in Android where does it goes? At the app "home",
>>>>> indeed.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not pretending to hurt anyone, in fact it is done to improve
>>>>> user's experience.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sorry but you need to improve your "intervention" heuristics, you
>>>>> can't break arbitrary apps out there. And this is a B2B app, not a scam
>>>>> website.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> -Andrea
>>>>>
>>>>> El jueves, 16 de mayo de 2019 a las 17:33:36 UTC+2,
>>>>> shiva...@chromium.org escribió:
>>>>>
>>>>>> (Response inline below.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 12:21 PM <lior...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How would this affect SPA websites that use push.history to allow
>>>>>>> navigation?
>>>>>>> Could you please clarify what could be the user's gesture?
>>>>>>> Thanks ahead,
>>>>>>> Lior
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As long as there is a user gesture on the document either before or
>>>>>> after history.pushState, the intervention would not happen.
>>>>>> User gesture are actions like click (spec
>>>>>> <https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/interaction.html#activation>
>>>>>> , Chrome's article about user activation
>>>>>> <https://developers.google.com/web/updates/2019/01/user-activation>
>>>>>> ).
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, May 7, 2019 at 10:08:04 PM UTC+3, Shivani Sharma wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (This intervention has been reviewed and approved for launch. As
>>>>>>>> discussed with API owners, announcing the change on blink-dev to ensure
>>>>>>>> that developers are made aware of this change.)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Contact emails
>>>>>>>> shiva...@chromium.org, jka...@chromium.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Specification:
>>>>>>>> https://github.com/WICG/interventions/issues/21
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Summary
>>>>>>>> Some pages makes it difficult or impossible for the user to go back
>>>>>>>> to the page they came from via the browser back button. This is
>>>>>>>> accomplished by redirects or by manipulating the browser history and
>>>>>>>> results in an abusive/annoying user experience.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The new behavior of the browser’s back button will be to skip over
>>>>>>>> pages that added history entries or redirected the user without ever
>>>>>>>> getting a user gesture. Note that the intervention only impacts the 
>>>>>>>> browser
>>>>>>>> back/forward button UI and not the history.back/forward APIs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here’s an example:
>>>>>>>> User is on a.com and clicks to go to b.com
>>>>>>>> b.com adds a history entry using pushState or navigates the user
>>>>>>>> to another page (c.com) without ever getting a user gesture.
>>>>>>>> b.com will then be skipped if the user presses back and user will
>>>>>>>> directly be navigated to a.com.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Given the above, developers should be aware that if they want the
>>>>>>>> browser’s back button to land on a page that redirected after loading, 
>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>> that page should have had a user gesture before redirecting. Developers
>>>>>>>> should also be aware that if a history entry is added but there is no 
>>>>>>>> user
>>>>>>>> gesture by the time the user hits back, the page adding the history 
>>>>>>>> entry
>>>>>>>> will be skipped and the popstate event will not fire.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This feature will be supported on all six Blink platforms (Windows,
>>>>>>>> Mac, Linux,
>>>>>>>> Chrome OS, Android, and Android WebView).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Tracking bug
>>>>>>>> crbug.com/907167
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Launch bug (internal only)
>>>>>>>> crbug.com/909862
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>> send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fd22997b-e4ba-465c-8729-4199270ff6b8%40chromium.org
>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/fd22997b-e4ba-465c-8729-4199270ff6b8%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>>>
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f670be3f-4783-47ca-9f07-f40e8966a19cn%40chromium.org
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/f670be3f-4783-47ca-9f07-f40e8966a19cn%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
Shivani

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAORsSEVrz7hLfzUppDWC-PVRBbhxwirUK3g-PHBZ%2BeBRp%2BzP2A%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to