Are you hoping to ship in 102?

On Monday, April 11, 2022 at 7:45:43 AM UTC-7 rou...@chromium.org wrote:

> Contact emails
>
> gle...@chromium.org, rou...@chromium.org
>
> Explainer
>
> https://github.com/WICG/digital-goods/blob/main/explainer.md#api-v21
>
> Specification
>
> https://wicg.github.io/digital-goods/
>
> Difference between 2.0 and 2.1 
> <https://pr-preview.s3.amazonaws.com/WICG/digital-goods/45/392c2ce...rsolomakhin:3ebdec3.html>
>
> Design docs
>
> https://github.com/WICG/digital-goods/blob/master/explainer.md
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Jbt2Mzt-xg1cWVlFScBQsoX_pE8Kg1gYpulxUSV8FM0/edit
>
> Summary
>
> We would like to ship a non-breaking addition to the existing Digital 
> Goods API. This change:
>
>    - 
>    
>    Adds to DigitalGoodsService:
>    - 
>       
>       Promise<sequence<PurchaseDetails>> listPurchaseHistory();
>       - 
>    
>    Adds to ItemDetails:
>    - 
>       
>       ItemType type;
>       - 
>       
>       sequence<DOMString> iconUrls;
>       - 
>       
>       unsigned short introductoryPriceCycles;
>       - 
>    
>    Adds enum ItemType.
>    
>
> Use of the new methods/fields will require developers to update supporting 
> code in their apps, such as Android Browser Helper 
> <https://github.com/GoogleChrome/android-browser-helper>.
>
> Blink component
>
> Blink>Payments 
> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EPayments>
>
> Search tags
>
> payments <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:payments>, billing 
> <https://chromestatus.com/features#tags:billing>
>
> TAG review
>
> https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/571 
>
> TAG review status
>
> TAG continues to think of DGAPI as a “product-specific API within one 
> company.”
>
> Other issues addressed.
>
> RisksInteroperability and Compatibility
>
> Similar to Payment Request: this API is used to talk to specific store 
> backends, and so its usage is tailored to the specific store. The reason 
> it's a proposed web standard is so that the same code (which is specific to 
> one store) is portable across browsers.
>
> Gecko: No signal (
> https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/349) Requested 
> 2020-05-27
>
> WebKit: No signal (
> https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-dev/2021-October/032001.html) 
> Requested 2021-10-08
>
> Web developers: Positive (
> https://discourse.wicg.io/t/proposal-web-payments-digital-product-management-api/4350
> )
>
> Other signals: rouslan@ presented DGAPI at 2021 TPAC 
> <https://www.w3.org/2021/Talks/rouslan-dgapi-20211028.pdf> (meeting notes 
> <https://www.w3.org/2021/10/28-wpwg-minutes.html#t04>) and at a PWA Dev 
> Sync 
> <https://drive.google.com/file/d/1a_6_QVEQrEeUduc8nPE-uc7PKCr-Yhx7/view> 
> (meeting 
> notes 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1X2j1wKC2T4RONcUGYxGus8Dytv6s2_tVTUSkWDWPza4/edit#heading=h.chc35okxwb9>).
>  
> Other browser implementers and app stores do not appear to have immediate 
> plans to engage with DGAPI. There were some questions, no objections.
>
> Ergonomics
>
> Used in tandem with the Payment Request API.
>
> WebView Application Risks
>
> This API is disabled in WebView.
>
>
> Debuggability
>
> We have had several requests from developers to make the API easier to 
> debug, but it is difficult due to the interaction with a backing service 
> based in an app/store context. We are looking for suggestions (
> https://github.com/WICG/digital-goods/issues/33) on how we might improve 
> the debuggability of the API.
>
> Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/master/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>
> ?
>
> The tests are in //third_party/blink/web_tests/wpt_internal/digital-goods.
>
> Flag name
>
> DigitalGoodsV2_1
>
> Requires code in //chrome?
>
> Yes
>
> Tracking bug
>
> https://crbug.com/1250604
>
> Launch bug
>
> https://crbug.com/1288420
>
> Estimated milestones
>
> We would like to ship DGAPI v2.1 in M102.
>
> Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status
>
> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5339955595313152
>
> Links to previous Intent discussions
>
> Intent to prototype 1.0:
>
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/vkS3k30lWNs.
>
> Intent to experiment 1.0:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/syI9_M9dANY/m/3lt-QGMHAgAJ
> .
>
> Intent to continue experimenting 1.0:
>
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/uoTx_cRuL5o.
>
> Intent to experiment 2.0:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/wIYqo3F_Vmo/m/uKw6hDa8BgAJ
> .
>
> Intent to ship 2.0:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/2pjQ3O2GzDA/m/BqQ7UL6gAwAJ
>
> Intent to continue experimenting 2.0:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/DqnurOUBA9s/m/5H18GilKEQAJ
>
> Intent to prototype 2.1:
>
>
> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/JaNDPCUr1ws/m/JFt-E7ePAQAJ
>
>
> This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status 
> <https://chromestatus.com/>.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/1cef881a-1fd4-44f2-96da-de3f6ae64128n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to