This I2P seems to have fallen through the cracks (understandably lots of vacation happening this month).
Any thoughts from API owners?

On 8/9/21 2:20 PM, Ari Chivukula wrote:


        *

        Contact emails

        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>,
        [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>


        Design Doc

        
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yhVLyEIpDhhDQf698WkvXBiPcLwxEgCBI4o1FjvXwfM/edit
        
<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1yhVLyEIpDhhDQf698WkvXBiPcLwxEgCBI4o1FjvXwfM/edit>


        Specification

        https://wicg.github.io/client-hints-infrastructure/
        <https://wicg.github.io/client-hints-infrastructure/>

        https://wicg.github.io/responsive-image-client-hints/
        <https://wicg.github.io/responsive-image-client-hints/>

        https://wicg.github.io/savedata/#save-data-request-header-field
        <https://wicg.github.io/savedata/#save-data-request-header-field>

        https://wicg.github.io/netinfo/#networkinformation-interface
        <https://wicg.github.io/netinfo/#networkinformation-interface>


        Summary

        This proposal seeks to align our implementation with the
        Client Hint proposal
        <https://wicg.github.io/client-hints-infrastructure/>by adding
        the `sec-ch-` prefix where it’s missing.


        Blink component

        Privacy>Fingerprinting
        
<https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component%3APrivacy%3EFingerprinting>


        Motivation

        Client Hints
        <https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/5995832180473856>, a
        method to request information about the user's device or
        conditions, have been implemented in Chrome, but since the
        initial implementation the naming scheme has changed. If
        implemented, this proposal would add new client hints with a
        `sec-ch-` prefix to re-implement the following: `dpr`,
        `width`, `viewport-width`, `device-memory`, `rtt`, `downlink`,
        and `ect`.


        TAG review

        Not needed


        *


        Risks


        *

        Only Blink implements client hints and we are not (yet)
        removing any current ones, just re-implementing existing ones
        under the correct name. If usage permits, we will remove the
        legacy names in the future.

        *


        Interoperability and Compatibility


        Gecko: Client hints not implemented

        WebKit: Client hints not implemented

        Web developers: Positive interest from Cloudinary
        
<https://discourse.wicg.io/t/responsive-image-client-hints-call-for-review/5470>


        Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests?

        Yes
        
<https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/refs/heads/main/third_party/blink/web_tests/external/wpt/client-hints/>


        Tracking bug

        https://crbug.com/1227043 <https://crbug.com/1227043>


        Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status

        https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6658223894429696
        <https://www.chromestatus.com/feature/6658223894429696>



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/7162dcb1-279f-b0f6-4502-6ceb1013980d%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to