bitcoin-development  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gmail
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gmail
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Andy Alness
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gmail
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Gmail
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Roy Badami
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposed BIP 70 extension Drak
• [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Thomas Voegtlin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Tamas Blummer
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Plans to separate wallet from core Pieter Wuille
• [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Sergio Lerner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Kevin
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: slush
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BlockPow: A Practical Proposal to prevent mining pools AND reduce payoff variance: Mark Friedenbach
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0 confirmation txs using replace-by-fee and game theory Isidor Zeuner
• [Bitcoin-development] CoinJoin bounty fund question Odinn Cyberguerrilla
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] CoinJoin bounty fund question Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] CoinJoin bounty fund question Kristov Atlas
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fidelity bonds for decentralized instant confirmation guarantees Goss, Brian C., M.D.
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fidelity bonds for decentralized instant confirmation guarantees Mark Friedenbach
• [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Gavin Andresen
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Peter Todd
  • [Bitcoin-development] New opcodes and transaction version numbers (was 'relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions') Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New opcodes and transaction version numbers (was 'relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions') Alan Reiner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] New opcodes and transaction version numbers (was 'relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions') Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Wladimir
• [Bitcoin-development] [ann] Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2 has been released Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [ann] Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2 has been released Jesus Cea
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] [ann] Bitcoin Core version 0.9.2 has been released Wladimir
• [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Raúl Martínez
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Ron Elliott
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Raúl Martínez
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Ron Elliott
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Christophe Biocca
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Karel Bílek
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Raúl Martínez
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Isidor Zeuner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposals for improving Bitcoin mining decentralization Mistr Bigs
• [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Proposal: allocate 8 service bits for experimental use Jeff Garzik
• [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Odinn Cyberguerrilla
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Justus Ranvier
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Incentivizing the running of full nodes Odinn Cyberguerrilla
• [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Andreas Schildbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension sebastien requiem
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Paul Goldstein
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Alex Kotenko
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Fidelity bonds for decentralized instant confirmation guarantees Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Alex Kotenko
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Jorge Timón
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Isidor Zeuner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Isidor Zeuner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Natanael
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Tom Harding
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Lawrence Nahum
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol backwards compatible proto buffer extension Daniel Rice
• [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Pavel Janík
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Pavel Janík
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final xor
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Un Ix
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Matt Whitlock
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Un Ix
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Mark Friedenbach
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Going to tag 0.9.2 final Wladimir
• [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4? Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4? Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4? Drak
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4? Odinn Cyberguerrilla
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4? Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Anyone still using SOCKS4? Odinn Cyberguerrilla
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] DNS seeds unstable Alex Kotenko
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] DNS seeds unstable Andreas Schildbach
• [Bitcoin-development] 0.9.2rc2 tagged, gitian builds needed Wladimir
• [Bitcoin-development] BIP38 Encrypted Address Discussion Richard Moore
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP38 Encrypted Address Discussion Gregory Maxwell
• [Bitcoin-development] Fwd: Your bit4coin order Kf Lee
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] PSA: Please sign your git commits Chris Beams
• [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin miner heads-up: "getwork" RPC going away Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin miner heads-up: "getwork" RPC going away Wladimir
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bitcoin miner heads-up: "getwork" RPC going away Pieter Wuille
• [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Raúl Martínez
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Toshi Morita
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Raúl Martínez
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Andrew Poelstra
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Raúl Martínez
  • [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions Raúl Martínez
• [Bitcoin-development] Wallet nLockTime best practices Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Wallet nLockTime best practices Aaron Voisine
  • [Bitcoin-development] Wallet nLockTime best practices Jeff Garzik
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Adam Back
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Alan Reiner
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Jeff Garzik
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Peter Todd
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] Bloom bait Mike Hearn
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Gregory Maxwell
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] NODE_BLOOM service bit Peter Todd
• Re: [Bitcoin-development] # error "Bitcoin cannot be compiled without assertions." <<<<NOT Pieter Wuille
  • Re: [Bitcoin-development] # error "Bitcoin cannot be compiled without assertions." <<<<NOT Jeff Garzik

• Later messages