> This all makes a lot of sense to me, and would help a lot with the > workflow. Unfortunately github pulls and issues really have nothing > to faciltate a multistage workflow... e.g. where something can go > through several steps.
Indeed, pull requests don't have a "status". It would be possible to (ab)use labels for this. The drawback of labels is that only the repository team can set these, there is no way to delegate. But I suppose it'd be possible to build something on top of the github API that handles this. > We're also having problems with people failing to comment on things, > not even "I looked at this and have no opinion", which is really > obstructing things. Well - the only way to avoid that is to set a reasonable deadline, after which there is a default decision. You'd hope this would motivate people to get involved in time. Wladimir ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Comprehensive Server Monitoring with Site24x7. Monitor 10 servers for $9/Month. Get alerted through email, SMS, voice calls or mobile push notifications. Take corrective actions from your mobile device. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Zoho _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
