Encryption is of little value if you may deduce the same information by observing packet sizes and timings.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:38 PM, J Ross Nicoll <j...@jrn.me.uk> wrote: > The concern is that if you can monitor traffic in and out of a single node, > you can determine which transactions originate from it vs those which it > relays. That's not great, certainly, but how many nodes actually require > that level of security, and surely they can use Tor or VPN services if so? > > Further, unless the remote nodes are in some way trusted, you're changing > the attack from read-only to requiring the ability to perform a man in the > middle attack - that doesn't seem much harder to me. > > As Gregory states, there's been at least two recent serious if not > catastrophic OpenSSL bugs, and the consequences of Heartbleed if the Bitcoin > network had been vulnerable are the stuff of nightmares. > > Very difficult to see the risk/reward payoff being worthwhile. > > Ross > > > On 19/08/2014 18:35, Johnathan Corgan wrote: > > On 08/19/2014 09:38 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > > We've dodged several emergency scale vulnerabilities by not having TLS. > > I'm still trying to understand the original premise that we want > encrypted communications between nodes. > > I can certainly see the value of having *authenticated* traffic with > specific nodes, using an HMAC for the protocol messages in place of the > current checksum. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Slashdot TV. > Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. > http://tv.slashdot.org/ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that matters. http://tv.slashdot.org/ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development