On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Luke Dashjr <l...@dashjr.org> wrote: > They can already do this. It's perfectly valid for wallets/services to ignore > (and not consider as payment) transactions using an address more than once. > There might be race attacks if this is implemented in an immediate fashon > (attacker transaction gets mined first to kill a payment), but should be > pretty safe after a few blocks.
Sure it's valid. However, few users will appreciate "you ignored my deposit" as a feature. Payment protocol just doesn't well the use cases of, * an on-going payment stream from, e.g. Eligius to coinbase * deposit addresses and deposit situations -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
