This is good news! Thank you very much Ben for the answer. On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:52:39 -0800 Ben Davenport <bendavenp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You can create a transaction which spends the output to yourself, attaching > a fee to that transaction. In order for miners to grab the transaction fee > on that transaction, they would have to also mine the original transaction. > Likely, you'd have to do this by hand, but software could be written to > simplify doing it. No protocol changes needed. > > Ben > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Dâniel Fraga <frag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Someone sent me a very small donation (0.00121 BTC) without > > paying fees. I don't know who sent it and I know this type of > > transaction are usually rejected by miners. Take a look at it below: > > > > https://imageshack.com/i/ngv5g8j > > > > Even with the a low probability of confirmation, I > > was hoping that after a few days it could be included in a block, but > > Blockchain.info simply removed it (I know the sender sent from a > > Blockchain.info wallet, because he added a note): > > > > > > https://blockchain.info/pt/tx/3cde47ee3979a46b36bd61bdb0caf9c11dea58ac99f17fb17b95728766de70e0 > > > > As you can see now it shows as "Transaction not found". > > > > My suggestion is: it would be nice if the receiver could have a > > chance to pay the fee when the sender didn't pay any fee. For example, > > I could pay a fee of 0.0001 BTC and receive 0.00121 BTC. In the end I'd > > have 0.00111 BTC. Better than nothing. > > > > Would it be technically possible to do that or it would be too > > much trouble to change the protocol to allow the receiver to pay an > > optional fee? > > > > Ps: I'm not a programmer, but if the receiver could > > optionally "attach" some fee to the transaction, even if he/she didn't > > sent the transaction, this could be solved. Bitcoin-qt could even warn > > the receiver he received a transaction without fee and if he wants > > faster confirmation he could pay a fee. > > > > Ps2: if this is a silly suggestion, just ignore it. I tried on > > Bitcointalk, but nobody answered. > > > > -- > > Linux 3.12.0: One Giant Leap for Frogkind > > http://www.youtube.com/DanielFragaBR > > http://mcxnow.com > > Bitcoin: 12H6661yoLDUZaYPdah6urZS5WiXwTAUgL > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. > > Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For > > Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. > > Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. > > > > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk > > _______________________________________________ > > Bitcoin-development mailing list > > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > > > -- Linux 3.12.0: One Giant Leap for Frogkind http://www.youtube.com/DanielFragaBR http://mcxnow.com Bitcoin: 12H6661yoLDUZaYPdah6urZS5WiXwTAUgL ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
