On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote: > "The payment protocol at least would need some notion of fee, or possibly > (better?) the ability for a recipient to specify some inputs as well as some > outputs."
<vendor hat: on> BitPay noticed this detail last week. We were noticing that some transactions were not even reaching our bitcoind border routers (edge nodes), due to low/no fees. That led to a long discussion of all things fee-related. SPV fees are a big issue. Getting child-pays-for-parent in some form out to miners is another. Getting a smart, dynamic fee market Gavin mentions is a big need. -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
