On 21/10/13 21:47, Luke-Jr wrote: > On Monday, October 21, 2013 7:38:37 PM Jean-Paul Kogelman wrote: >> 1) Should the protocol specification page also be codified into BIP(s)? > > Probably wouldn't hurt, but it'd likely need a rewrite in a more modular and > formal form.
I wanted to have a look at how the whole Bitcoin thing works recently. Being a distributed application, I've searched for the protocol spec. What I found were two wiki pages (Protocol & ProtocolRules) that looked more like notes someone wrote down while implementing the application. Have I missed something? Is there any effort underway trying to produce a decent spec? If not so, I am willing to help with that. Martin ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
