On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:24 AM, Robert Backhaus <rob...@robbak.com> wrote: > So the decision has been made to make 0-conf double spends trivial, so no > one will ever trust 0-confs. If a later transaction appears with a larger > fee, it will be considered to be the valid one, and the first one dropped, > as long as the first one has not been confirmed. This makes undoing a > mistaken transaction possible.
This has been suggested, but I know of no such decision having been made. -- Pieter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
