My first concern was that I and about everyone else only has TCP/UDP port forwarding, but at least for the first:
UDT uses UDP to transfer bulk data with its own reliability control and congestion control mechanisms. Multiple UDT flows can share a single UDP port, thus a firewall can open only one UDP port for all UDT connections. The latter appears not so friendly to NAT. On 3/23/2013 3:30 PM, Mark Friedenbach wrote: > If you're considering a datagram protocol, you might be interested in > some more modern alternatives to UDP: > > UDT: Breaking the Data Transfer Bottleneck > http://udt.sourceforge.net/ > > Stream Control Transmission Protocol > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stream_Control_Transmission_Protocol > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
