On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 11:27:13AM -0700, Mark Friedenbach wrote:
> I know there's people here who will jump in saying that the bitcoin
> protocol is the behavior of the Satoshi client, period. But which Satoshi
> client? 0.7 or 0.8?

The protocol is whatever the network enforces - and that is some mix of 
versions of the
reference client right now, but doesn't need to remain that way.

I would very much like to have a text book of rules that is authorative, and 
every client
that follows it would be correct. Unfortunately, that is not how a consensus 
system works.
All (full) clients validate all rules, and all must independently come to the 
same
solution. Consensus is of utmost importance, more than some theoretical 
"correctness".
If we'd have a specification document, and it was discovered that a lot of
nodes on the network were doing something different than the document, those 
nodes would
be buggy, but it would be the specification that is wrong.

That is what happened: 0.7 and before had a bug, but 0.8 was wrong for not 
following the
rules of the network (which I hate to say, as I'm responsible for many changes 
in 0.8).

As said in another thread, the problem in the old versions needs fixing (this 
would even
be the case if no 0.8 existed at all, and no fork risk existed at all). But 
let's please
do it in a way we can all agree about, in a controlled fashion.

-- 
Pieter

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

Reply via email to