On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Amir Taaki <zgen...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Check it :) https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin.org/pull/34
Personally, all this seems far too focused on a centralized website (bitcoin.org), and presents far too many choices at once to the user. On bitcoin.org (registered by Satoshi), I would rather see the Satoshi reference client and perhaps an "other clients" link on the wiki. Modern websites are working hard to _reduce_ the number of download links, not _increase_ them. See, e.g. http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora where a single download choice is presented, and then an "other options" link is below the great big download button. Rather than fighting over what a particular bitcoin.org page should look like, why not maintain an independently managed BitcoinClients.org website? Or GetBitcoinClient.org or somesuch. Solve this problem in a distributed fashion, rather than stuffing it all onto bitcoin.org. Bitcoin.org, IMO, is the home of the "reference project" not the entire bitcoin community. Emphasizing that months ago was why the forum was moved to bitcointalk.org. -- Jeff Garzik exMULTI, Inc. jgar...@exmulti.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
