On 1/02/2012 00:12, Gavin Andresen wrote: > RE: BIP 21 versus BIP 20: I like BIP 21; simpler is better. > > RE: signing and dating URIs: good ideas. I think we should agree > that there is consensus around BIP 21 and then after there is some > experience with signing/dating URIs you should write follow-up BIPs . >
If we had a self signed URI, we could just pay directly to the public key (or calculate the bitcoin address from it). It would no longer require a bitcoin address in the URI.
0x33B5E7D6.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
0x33B5E7D6.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
