On 1/02/2012 00:12, Gavin Andresen wrote:
> RE: BIP 21 versus BIP 20:  I like BIP 21; simpler is better.
> 
> RE: signing and dating URIs:  good ideas.  I think we should agree
> that there is consensus around BIP 21 and then after there is some
> experience with signing/dating URIs you should write follow-up BIPs .
> 

If we had a self signed URI, we could just pay directly to the public
key (or calculate the bitcoin address from it).  It
would no longer require a bitcoin address in the URI.

Attachment: 0x33B5E7D6.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: 0x33B5E7D6.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development

Reply via email to