Luke-Jr wrote: > On Wednesday, September 14, 2011 9:57:00 PM Gavin Andresen wrote: >> I'm looking for review of this pull request: >> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/517 > "Non-standard" transactions, or those with "insufficient" fees should not be > penalised. These are properly relay/miner policy decisions, not protocol > violations, and should be made more easily configurable, not punished for > configuration. > > A few non-standard transactions are probably legitimate. A whole bunch of them are probably not. I would think that assigning a point or two of badness to a peer sending one is pretty reasonable, with the understanding that we would need to adjust that as the network evolves.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Doing More with Less: The Next Generation Virtual Desktop What are the key obstacles that have prevented many mid-market businesses from deploying virtual desktops? How do next-generation virtual desktops provide companies an easier-to-deploy, easier-to-manage and more affordable virtual desktop model.http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51426474/ _______________________________________________ Bitcoin-development mailing list Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
