I think Jorge's request for specifics is reasonable. I agree that we can raise the level of discussion. Each claim about how good or bad a specific BIP is should say why on the technical merits. Comments on prior claims may expose misinformation, expose "trust me" authority, or point out other fallacies. They should include a citation of the original source, a fair restatement of the problematic claim for current readers, and a short explanation of why it doesn't advance understanding technical consensus.
There have been lots of mean comments. Some "Truth and Reconciliation" will come due, and it will be a huge amount of work. Another history book? _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
