Sorry I didn't see this snippet fully earlier, but I caught it in Optech (cc harding)
> *(I didn't think DROP/1 is necessary here? Doesn't leaving the 32 byte* > *hash on the stack evaluate as true? I guess that means everyone's > using**sapio to > construct the txs?)* Not quite: it would mean that everyone is using *sapio-miniscript**, *which may or may not be in Sapio, or they are using a different miniscript implementation that is compatible with sapio-miniscript's CTV fragment (which is sort of the most obvious way to implement it), or they are hand writing the script and are still using that fragment. E.g., you can see https://min.sc/nextc/#gist=001cf1fcb0e24ca9f3614c4db9bfe57d:2 or https://min.sc/nextc/#gist=001cf1fcb0e24ca9f3614c4db9bfe57d:0 both of these might "look" like sapio, but are built using minsc. The underlying point might still stand, but using miniscript seems different than using Sapio.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
