I would like to know people's sentiment about doing (a very slightly tweaked 
version of) BIP118 in place of
(or before doing) BIP119.

SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUT and its precedent iterations have been discussed for over 6 
years. It presents proven and
implemented usecases, that are demanded and (please someone correct me if i'm 
wrong) more widely accepted than
CTV's.

SIGHASH_ANYPREVOUTANYSCRIPT, if its "ANYONECANPAY" behaviour is made optional 
[0], can emulate CTV just fine.
Sure then you can't have bare or Segwit v0 CTV, and it's a bit more expensive 
to use. But we can consider CTV
an optimization of APO-AS covenants.

CTV advocates have been presenting vaults as the flagship usecase. Although as 
someone who've been trying to
implement practical vaults for the past 2 years i doubt CTV is necessary nor 
sufficient for this (but still
useful!), using APO-AS covers it. And it's not a couple dozen more virtual 
bytes that are going to matter for
a potential vault user.

If after some time all of us who are currently dubious about CTV's stated 
usecases are proven wrong by onchain
usage of a less efficient construction to achieve the same goal, we could 
roll-out CTV as an optimization.  In
the meantime others will have been able to deploy new applications leveraging 
ANYPREVOUT (Eltoo, blind
statechains, etc..[1]).


Given the interest in, and demand for, both simple covenants and better 
offchain protocols it seems to me that
BIP118 is a soft fork candidate that could benefit more (if not most of) 
Bitcoin users.
Actually i'd also be interested in knowing if people would oppose the APO-AS 
part of BIP118, since it enables
CTV's features, for the same reason they'd oppose BIP119.


[0] That is, to not commit to the other inputs of the transaction (via 
`sha_sequences` and maybe also
`sha_amounts`). Cf 
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0118.mediawiki#signature-message.

[1] https://anyprevout.xyz/ "Use Cases" section
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

Reply via email to