Good morning ZmnSCPxj, > Of course, I know of no such technique, but given that a technique > (Drivechains) which before would have required its own consensus change, > turns out to be implementable inside recursive covenants, then I wonder if > there are other things that would have required their own consensus change > that are now *also* implementable purely in recursive covenants.
Agree. I would be interested to know what is NOT possible once we have recursive covenants. > if there is *now* consensus that Drivechains are not bad, go ahead, add > recursive covenants (but please can we add `SIGHASH_NOINPUT` and `OP_CTV` > first?) Agree and I think everything can be done in separate soft forks. -- Prayank A3B1 E430 2298 178F
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
