The least reasonable thing I could expect is some claimed former holder of some ordianls turning up to challenge me that it was their stolen Bitcoin was some of what I received.
I think it's unlikely that this would come to pass. A previous owner of an ordinal wouldn't have any particular reason to expect that they should own it after they transfer it. Similar to how noting a dollar bill's serial number doesn't give you a claim to it after you spend it. From the BIP: Since any ordinal can be sent to any address at any time, ordinals that are transferred, even those with some public history, should be considered to be fungible with other satoshis with no such history. <https://github.com/casey/ord/blob/master/bip.mediawiki#backward-compatibility>
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
