Good morning Prayank,
> 1. The spending tx of multisig can be decided earlier and all three can > review the outputs involved in it. All 3 txs involved in the system if we > consider only one mixer and not a chain will get confirmed in the same block > as we are using CPFP so child pays for 2 parent txs. However, disputes are > possible and to manage it we will have to make the system complex with things > like Peer 1 locking some amount in a 2 of 2 multisig with Peer 2 or some > other incentives structure. Initially we can try to keep it simple and a way > to spend coins after coinjoin with the help of another person you trust. The payee is not necessary here and you can remove the intermediate transactions that pay to 2-of-3s. > 2. Yes, you described coinjoin in joinmarket but the problem I am trying to > solve is: spend coins after coinjoin because post-mix usage is as important > as coinjoin. Some users dont follow the best practices after coinjoin and it > makes coinjoin useless or less effective in that case and sometimes for > others involved in the process as well. ... I already mentioned this, but what I am describing is *how JoinMarket spends coins from its wallet*. That means that what I am describing is *how JoinMarket performs spends after mixing, i.e. post-mix*. I was not describing how JoinMarket performs mixing. Is that clearer now? Regards, ZmnSCPxj _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
