I already pointed out a while ago that the separator could be the & and the returning value is either an address or an array of addresses. So no comma or other delimiter needed. also I would suggest to call the parameter `address` and not a shortcut for it as we are used to `message` and `amount` spelled out as well.
On 18.10.2018 16:20, Clark Moody via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Since we don't know what sort of address changes will happen later on, you > could make this future-proof by passing a list of addresses to `addr`. > > The syntax is > > bitcoin:<address>[?addr=<address>[,<address>[,<address>]]]
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
