On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:19 PM, Rhavar via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > Interesting. I didn't think about this before, but it seems like bip125 is > rather incentive incompatible right now? If we're assuming a competitive > mempool, it really doesn't seem generally rational to accept a replacement > transaction of a lower fee rate.
BIP125 replacement requires that the fee rate increases. The text of the BIP document is written in a confusing way that doesn't make this clear. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
