Op 27 sep. 2017, om 22:01 heeft Bryan Bishop via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> het volgende geschreven: > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:56 PM, Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: > What do people think about modifying BIP 2 to allow editors to merge these > kinds of changes without involving the Authors? Strictly speaking, BIP 2 > shouldn't be changed now that it is Active, but for such a minor revision, I > think an exception is reasonable. > > Even minor revisions can not change the meaning of text. Changing a single > word can often have a strange impact on the meaning of the text. There should > be some amount of care exercised here. Maybe it would be okay as long as > edits are mentioned in the changelog at the bottom of each document, or > mention that the primary authors have not reviewed suggested changes, or > something as much; otherwise the reader might not be aware to check revision > history to see what's going on.
Perhaps it's enough to @mention authors in the PR and give them a week to object before merging? Sjors
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
