On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:51:45PM +0200, Jorge Timón via bitcoin-dev wrote: > This is not a priority, not very important either. > Right now it is possible to create 0-value outputs that are spendable > and thus stay in the utxo (potentially forever). Requiring at least 1 > satoshi per output doesn't really do much against a spam attack to the > utxo, but I think it would be slightly better than the current > situation.
Given that this has a very minimal cost for spammers - just a single satoshi - I don't think this is worth the risk of making future upgrades more complex as other posters have brought up. Secondly, I think we have good reason to think that things like my own TXO commitments and Bram's related work will make UTXO growth a non-issue in the future. So, I'd NACK such a proposal myself. -- https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
