Instead of block thresholds, use utxo bits to coordinate size changes (larger and smaller should be allowed).
There is no reason for miners to be involved in a decision to change this aspects of the protocol. Plenty of other ways to coordinate. Otherwise someone can make it seem to a miner like 99pct of nodes are ready for a larger weight.... even though that's false. On May 23, 2017 8:03 AM, "Tomas via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > I have a proposal that would allow each user to optionally configure the > maximum block weight at a support threshold. > > It recognizes that there is no need for off chain bickering, by > providing a mechanism that lets each users freely choose their own > parameters while still maintaining full coordination of any changes. > > The BIP can be found here: > > https://github.com/tomasvdw/bips/blob/master/bip-changing- > the-maximum-block%20weight-based-on-a-support-threshold.mediawiki > > It is worth noting that this proposal does neither gives more power to > miners nor reduces decentralization. Miners still rely on their blocks > being accepted by economic nodes to sell their minted coins. This > proposal doesn't change that. > > Regards, > Tomas van der Wansem > bitcrust > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
