On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:58 PM, praxeology_guy < praxeology_...@protonmail.com> wrote:
> Bram Cohen, > > In R&D: First its appropriate to explore all interesting ideas, and help > each other improve their ideas. Last, when there is a deadline that needs > to be met, we compare various options and decide on which to go with. > > I'm on the First step still. > In that case you should read my txo bitfield proposal, instead of taking my postings yesterday as a prompt to respond to something completely unrelated. > If you really want to push me to saying it, I'm not a fan of the Patricia > Tree for bitcoin txos. I think its too much work for everyone to do when > other options are available. But I'm not trying to say that your design is > bad or wont work... I'm just personally not interested in it at this time. > My bitfield proposal is different from the patricia trie stuff. Also your objection about patricia tries being 'too much work' is nonsensical because they're quite a bit simpler than MMRs.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
