On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Wang Chun via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > The basic idea is, as many of us agree, hard fork is risky and should > be well prepared. We need a long time to deploy it. > Much as it may be appealing to repeal the block size limit now with a grace period until a replacement is needed in a repeal and replace strategy, it's dubious to assume that an idea can be agreed upon later when it can't be agreed upon now. Trying to put a time limit on it runs into the possibility that you'll find that whatever reasons there were for not having general agreement on a new setup before still apply, and running into the embarrassing situation of winding up sticking with the status quo after much sturm and drang.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
