On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Dave Scotese <dscot...@litmocracy.com> wrote: > I think a BIP is a good idea, but rather than making such a specific > proposal as "Let's use bit 4 to indicate communication of thin blocks," how > about a more general one like "Let's use bit(s?) 4(-5?) as user-agent
Not communicated in address messages, so useless for discovery. I think any feature which could do this could use the BIP130 approach instead. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
