On Tuesday, February 16, 2016 8:20:26 PM Alex Morcos via bitcoin-dev wrote: > # The feefilter message is defined as a message containing an int64_t where > pchCommand == "feefilter"
What happened to extensibility? And why waste 64 bits for what is almost certainly a small number? > # The fee filter is additive with a bloom filter for transactions so if an > SPV client were to load a bloom filter and send a feefilter message, > transactions would only be relayed if they passed both filters. This seems to make feefilter entirely useless for wallets? Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
