> On Feb 7, 2016, at 2:27 PM, <jl2...@xbt.hk> <jl2...@xbt.hk> wrote: > > Normal version number only suggests softforks, which is usually not a concern > for SPV clients.
Soft forks affect the security of low-confirmation (zero or one) transactions sent to SPV wallets even more than hard forks, and because many users and businesses choose convenience over airtight security I would argue transaction validation rule changes are a VERY big concern for lightweight clients. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
