What if someone complains? We can't even tell whether a complaint is
legit or just trolling. That's why I think we need some general
consensus rules which is not written in code, but as a social contract.
Breaking those rules would be considered as a hardfork and is allowed
only in exceptional situation.
Jonathan Toomim via bitcoin-dev 於 2015-12-29 07:42 寫到:
That sounds like a rather unlikely scenario. Unless you have a
specific reason to suspect that might be the case, I think we don't
need to worry about it too much. If we announce the intention to
perform such a soft fork a couple of months before the soft fork
becomes active, and if nobody complains about it destroying their
secret stash, then I think that's fair enough and we could proceed.
On Dec 28, 2015, at 11:47 PM, jl2012 via bitcoin-dev
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Do we need to consider that someone may have a timelocked big tx, with
private key lost?
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
