On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Christian Decker via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> As with the previous version, which was using a hard-fork, the normalized > transaction ID is computed only considering the non-malleable parts of a > transaction, i.e., stripping the signatures before computing the hash of > the transaction. > <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev> Is this proposal recursive? *Coinbase transaction * * n-txid = txid *Non-coinbase transactions* * replace sigScripts with empty strings * replace txids in TxIns with n-txid for parents The 2nd step is recursive starting from the coinbases. In effect, the rule is that txids are what they would have been if n-txids had been used right from the start.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
