Thank you for posting that, most informative, and suggest people arguing here lately to read it carefully.
May I suggest that people who wish to debate what rough consensus means, to take it to this reddit thread https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3ntga9/bitcoindev_a_brilliant_post_on_defining_consensus/ Thanks again for posting, helpful context/reminder for all. Adam On 7 October 2015 at 07:07, Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev <[email protected]> wrote: > Bitcoin's participants can improve their ability to stay on a valuable > and censorship resistant blockchain by individually and informally > absorbing cultural wisdom regarding "rough consensus". This does not > require writing any formal rules about what rough consensus is. It is > a matter of participation with an understanding. > > https://www.ietf.org/tao.html#rfc.section.2 ... _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
