Hi Byron, I've been using shadow a bit-- I think these simulators are important for testing, but Shadow, at least, certainly seems to have limitations, in some crucial respects. Running shadow w Tor (which is only logical, because many BCT transactions transpire over Tor) is not as 'light' as presented and slows my own box down quite a bit, so the stats can't possibly be accurate... I don't know if this answers any questions or if you've had this experience at all -- perhaps it is negligible on a more powerful machine than my own-- or perhaps there is an adjustment still unaccounted?
Regards, Nina K Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 4, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Byron Gibson via bitcoin-dev > <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > Hi all, is anyone using simulators like Shadow (https://shadow.github.io), > BTCSim (https://github.com/btcsuite/btcsim), etc. to test proposed changes to > Bitcoin? I have a few questions about their capabilities and limitations. > > Byron Gibson > http://mirror.co/ > https://keybase.io/byrongibson > > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
