> > we have NO hard fork mechanism in place that isn't highly prone to > systemic consensus failure. >
Just use an opcode that isn't currently defined. Done. What about that mechanism is prone to failure? Re: coma. No need for insults. Please read my article and address the points raised there, which, by the way, do not include any mention of SPV wallets. Although your belief that SPV wallets are "inherently insecure" seems needlessly trollish - I certainly would disagree, but it's a different debate.
_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
