On Friday, September 04, 2015 9:36:42 PM Andy Chase wrote: > I understand your concerns. What kinds of changes do you think should go > through a process like this? Just hard forks?
The process loses meaning if it doesn't reflect reality. So only hardforks should go through the hardfork process; only softforks through the softfork process; etc. Trying to make one-size-fits-all just means de facto accepted BIPs wouldn't be recognised as such because nobody cares to meet the higher requirements. Luke _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
